PERBEDAAN PENGETAHUAN STRUKTUR ANATOMI NORMAL RADIOGRAF PANORAMIK ANTARA MAHASISWA PREKLINIK DAN KLINIK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33854/jbd.v1i1.492Keywords:
Knowledge, Normal Anatomical, PengetahuanAbstract
Latar belakang: Adanya kesalahan interpretasi dapat menyebabkan kesalahan dalam mendiagnosis yang berujung pada kesalahan perawatan. Keakuratan dalam mengidentifikasi struktur anatomi normal akan membantu praktisi kedokteran gigi untuk menginterpretasi hasil radiograf. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perbedaan pengetahuan mahasiswa preklinik dan klinik bagian kedokteran gigi dan mulut Universitas Sriwijaya mengenai struktur anatomi normal radiograf panoramik. Metode: Penelitian ini adalah survei analitik dengan pendekatan potong lintang (cross sectional). Penelitian ini melibatkan 100 subjek. Subjek penelitian terdiri atas kelompok mahasiswa preklinik (n=50) dan mahasiswa klinik (n=50). Pengetahuan struktur anatomi normal diukur menggunakan metode kuesioner online melalui Google form. Kuesioner berisi 15 pertanyaan pilihan ganda sambil diperlihatkan foto panoramik dengan waktu maksimal 20 menit. Data dianalisis menggunakan uji Mann-Whitney. Hasil: Hasil yang diperoleh struktur anatomi prosesus kondiloideus, tuberositas maksilaris, sinus maksilaris, palatum durum, inferior border of mandible, ramus mandibula, cervical vertebrae, artikularis eminensia, kanalis mandibularis, foramen mentalis dan submandibular gland fossa cukup baik diketahui oleh mahasiswa preklinik dan klinik. Pengetahuan prosesus koronoideus dan nasopharyngeal air space cukup rendah, terutama prosesus stiloideus dan lidah cukup rendah pada kedua kelompok. Nilai rerata skor pengetahuan pada kelompok mahasiswa preklinik lebih rendah namun tidak bermakna dibandingkan kelompok mahasiwa klinik (p>0,05). Kesimpulan: Mahasiswa preklinik dan klinik kedokteran gigi dan mulut Universitas Sriwijaya sama-sama memiliki pengetahuan yang cukup baik mengenai struktur anatomi normal radiograf panoramik.References
Mallya SM, Lam EWN. White and pharoah oral radiology : Principles and interpretation. 8 th ed. Canada: Elsevier; 2014. p.419-462.
McNab S, Monsour P, Madden D, Gannaway D. Knowledge of undergraduate and graduate dentists and dental therapists concerning panoramic radiographs: Knowledge of panoramic radiographs. Open Journal of Dentistry and Oral Medicine. 2015; 3(2): 46-52. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f453/0cac20c0468801d950cf89872aafca8f4cfd.pdf
Misch CE, Resnik RR. Dental implant prosthetics. 2nd ed. Mosby: Elsevier; 2015.p.130-5.
Watanabe PCA, Faria V, Camargo AJ. Multiple radiographic analysis (Systemic disease): Dental panoramic radiography. J Oral Health Dent Care. 2017; 1(1):1-10.
http://www.scientificoajournals.org/pdf/johd.007.pdf
Perschbacher S. Interpretation of panoramic radiographs. Australian Dental Journal. 2012; 57(1 Suppl): 40-5.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22376096
Venkatraman S, Gowda JS, Kamarthi N. Unusual ghost image in a panoramic radiograph. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011; 40(6): 397-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3520343/
Lakshman AR, Kannepady SH, Kalkur C. Mental foramen mimicking as periapical pathology - A case report. Journal of Health Sciences. 2014; 4(2):126-9. https://www.jhsci.ba/ojs/index.php/jhsci/article/view/149/146
Avsever H, Gunduz K, Ozgedik S, Ozturk HP, Ozarslanturk S, Orhan K. Case report multiple accessory mental foramen: a rare anatomical finding. Dentistry Adv Res. 2017; 2(4): 1-4. https://www.gavinpublishers.com/admin/assets/articles_pdf/1510458678article_pdf1162742222.pdf
Ramugade MM, Sonkurla SP, Naik RA. Comprehensive management of misdiagnosed periapical pathology mimicking the mental foramen using cone beam computed tomography as a diagnostic aid – a rare case report. Acta Scientific Dental Science. 2017; 1(1): 57-62. https://actascientific.com/ASDS/ASDS-01-0010.php
More CB, Das S, Gupta S, Patel P, Saha N. Stafne’s bone cavity: a diagnostic challenge. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015; 9(11): ZD16-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4668534/
Cartes G, Garay I, Deana NF, Navarro P, Alves N. Mandibular canal course and the position of the mental foramen by panoramic x-ray in chilean individuals. Biomed Res Int. 2018; 2018: 1-10.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29984228
Ok E, Gungor E, Colak M, Altunsoy M, Nur BG, Aglarci OS. Evaluation of relationship between the maxillary posterior teeth and the sinus floor using cone-beam computed tomography. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014; 36(9): 907-14. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24874032
Imada TSN, Silva LMP, Fernandes R, Centurion BS, Oliveira-Santos C, Honório HM, Fischer IR, Rubira-Bullen. Accessory mental foramina: prevalence, position and diameter assessed by cone-beam computed tomography and digital panoramic radiographs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014; 25(2): 94–9.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23167944
Konsil Kedokteran Indonesia. Standar kompetensi dokter gigi indonesia. Jakarta. Konsil kedokteran Indonesia; 2015. p.13.
İlgüy D, İlgüy M, Dölekoğlu ZS, Ersan N, Fişekçioğlu E. Evaluation of radiological anatomy knowledge among dental students. Yeditepe Dental J. 2017; 31-6.
https://www.journalagent.com/yeditepe/pdfs/YDJ_13_3_31_36.pdf
Maeda N, Hosoki H, Yoshida M, Suito H, Honda E. Dental students’ levels of understanding normal panoramic anatomy. J Dent Sci. 2018; 13(4): 374-7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6388826/
Iannuci JM, Howerton LJ. Dental radiography principles and technique. 5th ed. Missouri: Elsevier; 2016.p.246-9; 315-30.
Karjodkar FR. Textbook of dental and maxillofacial radiology. 2nd ed. Jaypee brothers medical publishers; 2009. p. 248-54.
Maeda N, Hosoki H, Yoshida M, Suito H, Honda E. Dental students’ levels of understanding normal panoramic anatomy. J Dent Sci. 2018; 13(4): 374-7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6388826/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
