PENGARUH PH SALIVA TERHADAP KEKUATAN TARIK DIAMETRAL RESIN KOMPOSIT NANOHYBRID

Authors

  • Nilasary Rochmanita Suparno Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  • Aulia Syahnas Nabila Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33854/jbd.v10i1.941

Keywords:

kekuatan tarik diametral, pH saliva, resin komposit nanohybrid

Abstract

Introduction: Nanohybrid composite resin is a restorative material that is often used because of its aesthetics and adequate mechanical properties. One of the mechanical properties of nanohybrid composite resins is diametral tensile strength, which affects the strength of composite resins when receiving chewing loads when used in the oral cavity. The value of the mechanical strength of the composite resin can be influenced by several factors, namely food, drink, and saliva. Human saliva has different pH levels and always interacts with restorative materials in the oral cavity. Objective: To determine the effect of salivary pH variations on the diametral tensile strength of nanohybrid composite resin. Methods: The materials used in the study were nanohybrid composite resin (Filtek Z250 XT, 3MESPE, USA), artificial saliva pH 4, pH 7, and pH 10. The type of research was a true experimental laboratory with a posttest-only control group design, which measured the diametral tensile strength of the nanohybrid composite resin that had been immersed in three treatment groups, namely the group immersed in saliva with pH 4, pH 7, and pH 10, with a total of 27 samples using the Universal Testing Machine (JTM, Taiwan). The results obtained were analyzed for one- way and post-hoc LSD variance. Results: Samples at acidic pH had the lowest average diametral tensile strength (39.09 MPa) compared to neutral pH (57.54 MPa) and alkaline pH (49.13 MPa). Statistical analysis showed significant differences between groups (p<0.05). Conclusion: Nanohybrid composite resin at neutral salivary pH has greater diametral tensile strength than at acidic or basic salivary pH

References

Suparno NR, Hidayah NU. Pengaruh Lama Perendaman Resin Komposit Nanohybrid dalam Saliva pH Asam terhadap Perlekatan Streptococcus mutans. JIKG. 2019; 2(2): 1-6.

Putri JNS, Elline E. Diametral Tensile Strength of Microhybrid and Nanohybrid Composite Resins. Journal of Indonesian Dental Association. 2021; 4(1): 41-46.

Cangul S, Adiguzel O. The Latest Developments Related to Composite Resins. Int Dent Res. 2017; 7(2):32-41.

Kowalska A, Sokolowski J, Bociong K. The Photoinitiators Used in Resin Based Dental Composite — A Review and Future Perspectives. Polymers (Basel). 2021; 13(3): 470.

Hong G, Yang J, Jin X, Wu T, Dai S, Xie H, Chen C. Mechanical Properties of Nanohybrid Resin Composites Containing Various Mass Fractions of Modified Zirconia Particles, International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2020; 15: 9891-9907.

Rathod A, Vadavadagi SV, Verma T, Kumar P, Deepak PV, Deb S, Iqbal A. Effect of Acidic Beverages on Color Stability and Microhardness of Various Esthetic Restorative Materials: A Comparative Study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021; 13(2): S1084- S1087.

Pratap B, Gupta RK, Bhardwaj B, Nag M. Resin Based Restorative Dental Materials: Characteristic and Future Perspectives. Japanese Dental Science Review. 2019; 55: 126-38.

Al-Shekhli AAR, Aubi IA. Composite Diametral Tensile Strength. World J Dent. 2018; 9(6): 457-461.

Abouelmagd DM, Basheer RR. Microhardness Evaluation of Microhybrid Versus Nanofilled Resin Composite After Exposure to Acidic Drinks. J Int Soc Prev Communit Dent. 2022; 12(3): 353-359.

Alzraikat H, Burrow MF, Maghaireh GA, Taha NA. Nanofilled Resin Composite Properties and Clinical Performance: A Review. Operative Dentistry. 2018; 43(4): E173-E190.

Alshahrani FA, AlToraibily F, Alzaid M, Mahrous AA, AlGhamdi MA, Gad MM. An Updated Review of Salivary pH Effects on Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA)-Based Removable Dental Prostheses. Polymers (Basel). 2022; 14(16): 3387.

Adhani R, Hidayat S, Arya, IW. Perbedaan pH Saliva Menggosok Gigi Sebelum dan Sesudah Mengkonsumsi Makanan Manis dan Lengket. Dentino (Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi). 2014; 2(1): 39-45.

ASTM D695-10. Standart Test Method for Compressive Properties of Rigid Plastics. ASTM International. United States; 2010.

Sakaguchi RL, Powers JM.Craig’s: Restorative Dental Materials 13th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby, Inc; 2012. p.161-81.

Badole GP, Shenoi PR, Kubde R, Bengal S. Comparative Evaluation of Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Bulk-fill Composite Placed in Artificial Saliva at Three Different pH. World J Dent. 2023; 14(4): 331–335

Islam MS, Nassar M, Elsayed MA, Jameel DB, Ahmad TT, Rahman MM. In Vitro Optical and Physical Stability of Resin Composite Materials with Different Filler Characteristics. Polymers (Basel). 2023; 15(9): 2121.

Rahim TNA, Mohamad D, Md Akil H, Rahman IA. Water Sorption Characteristics of Restorative Dental Composites Immersed in

Downloads

Published

2023-07-06

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 1 (2023): Vol 10 No 1, Juni 2023

Section

Research

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).